Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Survey Study in the USA.

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that results in nonscarring hair loss. AA is comorbid with mental health disorders including anxiety and depression. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in relation to hair loss in patients with AA. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's (NAAF) email list. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Participants were asked to complete the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5), a validated screening tool for PTSD in the context of their AA. Results: Of the 1,449 completed surveys (completion rate 79.6%), most respondents were female (83.8%) and white (76.6%) with an average age of 50.6 ± 15.6 years. Respondents had AA for an average of 17.7 ± 15.8 years, with 91.4% experiencing current active hair loss. A total of 33.9% of respondents screened positively for PTSD, with an average score of 48.8 ± 12.3 on the PCL-5 in participants who screened positively. Participants with alopecia totalis have the highest average PCL-5 score of 30.1 ± 19.2, followed by participants with alopecia universalis with an average score of 26.0 ± 19.9, and lastly patchy AA with an average score of 24.5 ± 18.3 (p = 0.003). Feelings of intrusion and avoidance were the predominant reported symptoms. Total PTSD scores were significantly higher in respondents who were younger and identified as Black or African American and Hispanic when compared to white and non-Hispanic respondents, respectively. Conclusion: These findings identify that one in 3 patients with AA in this cohort meet the screening criteria for PTSD specifically relating to their hair loss experience. These results further highlight the mental health comorbidities associated with AA and emphasize that these symptoms may persist even after hair regrowth. Limitations include the nonrandomized NAAF population with most participants being white females. Future studies should confirm these findings in other patient populations. Finally, respondent's baseline mental health was not assessed; therefore, a causal relationship between AA and PTSD cannot be deduced.

Analytic optimization of Plasmodium falciparum marker gene haplotype recovery from amplicon deep sequencing of complex mixtures.

Molecular epidemiologic studies of malaria parasites commonly employ amplicon deep sequencing (AmpSeq) of marker genes derived from dried blood spots (DBS) to answer public health questions related to topics such as transmission and drug resistance. As these methods are increasingly employed to inform direct public health action, it is important to rigorously evaluate the risk of false positive and false negative haplotypes derived from clinically-relevant sample types. We performed a control experiment evaluating haplotype recovery from AmpSeq of 5 marker genes (ama1, csp, msp7, sera2, and trap) from DBS containing mixtures of DNA from 1 to 10 known P. falciparum reference strains across 3 parasite densities in triplicate (n=270 samples). While false positive haplotypes were present across all parasite densities and mixtures, we optimized censoring criteria to remove 83% (148/179) of false positives while removing only 8% (67/859) of true positives. Post-censoring, the median pairwise Jaccard distance between replicates was 0.83. We failed to recover 35% (477/1365) of haplotypes expected to be present in the sample. Haplotypes were more likely to be missed in low-density samples with <1.5 genomes/µL (OR: 3.88, CI: 1.82-8.27, vs. high-density samples with ≥75 genomes/µL) and in samples with lower read depth (OR per 10,000 reads: 0.61, CI: 0.54-0.69). Furthermore, minority haplotypes within a sample were more likely to be missed than dominant haplotypes (OR per 0.01 increase in proportion: 0.96, CI: 0.96-0.97). Finally, in clinical samples the percent concordance across markers for multiplicity of infection ranged from 40%-80%. Taken together, our observations indicate that, with sufficient read depth, haplotypes can be successfully recovered from DBS while limiting the false positive rate.

Treatment Patterns for Alopecia Areata in the US.

Importance: Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by hair loss ranging from patches of hair loss to more extensive forms, including alopecia totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis (AU). There is a lack of consensus for treatment. Understanding current practice patterns could help the identification of treatment needs and development of standards of care. Objective: To review treatment patterns for adults with AA in the US between 2015 and 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used medicine and pharmacy claims for commercially insured individuals from the IBM MarketScan Research Database to assess adults (≥18 years) newly treated for AA between October 15, 2015, and February 28, 2020. Alopecia areata was identified based on having at least 1 diagnosis of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code L63.x. Patients were required to have at least 365 days of continuous health plan enrollment before and after the cohort entry date. Patients were required to be free of AA diagnosis codes 365 days before the cohort entry date. Statistical analyses were conducted between 2019 and 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were treatment patterns for all patients with AA and subgroups of (1) patients with AT or AU and (2) those cared for by a dermatologist on the cohort entry date. Longitudinal therapy course during the first year after the diagnosis was also examined. Results: The study cohort consisted of 45 483 individuals (mean [SD] age, 43.8 [14.2] years; 29 903 [65.7%] female). During the year of follow-up, 30 217 patients (66.4%) received at least 1 AA treatment. The most common treatments were intralesional (19 014 [41.8%]), topical (18 604 [40.9%]), intramuscular (17 328 [38.1%]), and oral (9378 [20.6%]) corticosteroids. Compared with patients without AT or AU, patients with AT or AU a lower frequency of intralesional steroid (359 [11.1%] vs 18 655 [44.1%], P < .001) and higher frequency of topical corticosteroid (817 [25.4%] vs 17 787 [42.1%], P < .001) use. Almost half of patients (21 489 [47.2%]) received no treatment on the day of diagnosis. By 12 months, 32 659 (71.8%) were not receiving any treatment, making no treatment the largest study group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort study of commercially insured individuals, corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment for adults with AA between 2015 and 2020. At 365 days after diagnosis, more than two-thirds of patients were no longer receiving any AA treatment. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for the absence of treatment.

Experiencing Workplace Bullying in Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune-mediated hair loss condition with substantial psychosocial impact. The impact of AA on social interactions at work has not been established. Methods: We administered the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised Scale to the National Alopecia Areata Foundation database to evaluate workplace bullying in patients with AA. Results: Ultimately, 673/1,120 individuals who met inclusion criteria completed the survey. Most respondents were female (n = 537, 79.8%), Caucasian (n = 508, 75.5%), with an average age of 46.8 ± 14, and employed full-time (n = 427, 63.4%). Our results demonstrate 21.7% (n = 146) of respondents experienced workplace bullying. Participants most frequently faced having their opinions ignored (53.8%, n = 362), being excluded (47.7%, n = 321), and having gossip spread about them (44.0%, n = 296). Notably, 75.0% (n = 120/160) of individuals who self-reported bullying addressed the behavior; however, 30.8% of participants noted the bully continued (30.8%, n = 37). Stress associated with filing a complaint (43.5%, n = 293) and effect on future career options (36.1%, n = 243) were common barriers to report bullying. Conclusion: This study expands our understanding of the psychosocial impact of AA by confirming individuals with AA experience workplace bullying. Stigma against patients may play a role in this phenomenon. Future work is warranted to identify strategies to reduce bullying against patients with AA.

Assessing Patient's Values When Selecting Treatments for Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that results in nonscarring hair loss. There is currently only one Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for AA; as a result, a wide range of treatments are commonly administered. This study aimed to determine how patients with AA prioritize treatment characteristics when choosing a therapy. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's (NAAF) email list. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Participants were asked to rank the importance of five treatment domains. Results: Of the 1,074 completed surveys (completion rate 77.4%), most respondents were female (85.4%) and white (77.8%) with an average age of 49.3 ± 15.4 years. Respondents had AA for an average of 17.7 ± 15.4 years, with 90.0% experiencing current active hair loss. 95.6% of respondents considered the treatment's ability to achieve hair regrowth as important, 93.9% listed the availability of information about the treatment (e.g., via doctor or online) as important, 89.1% ranked the treatment side effects as important, 75.7% the cost, and 68.0% the convenience of use. A sub-analysis was performed examining responses between respondents who identify as white versus nonwhite, which showed that while the order of importance was the same between groups, a significantly larger proportion of nonwhite respondents attributed higher importance to cost (white: 73.8%, nonwhite: 82.4%; p = 0.006) and convenience (white: 65.3%, nonwhite: 77.3%; p < 0.001) than their white counterparts. Discussion/Conclusion: These findings identify key domains that can serve as a starting point in shared decision-making between patients and physicians. This knowledge can streamline dermatologist delivery of key information and highlight areas of improvement for future therapeutics. Limitations include the nonrandomized NAAF population with most participants being white females. Future studies should confirm these findings in other patient populations.

Physician values in alopecia areata treatment decision-making: A qualitative assessment.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease of hair loss with multiple treatment options. Physicians play an important role in guiding patients during the decision-making process. Objective: Assess physicians' values and attitudes when helping patients choose an AA treatment. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with dermatologists of varying practice type and location. Each interview was coded independently twice using inductive thematic analysis. Interrater reliability and code frequencies were determined. Results: Fourteen participants were interviewed. Interrater reliability was κ = 0.85 to 0.97. Dermatologists wanted patients to consider various treatment factors (ie, efficacy, safety, convenience of use, accessibility) and also assessed patients' AA clinical severity and personality traits. Participants often encountered various barriers to effective communication with patients, which may be mitigated by shared decision-making. Shared decision-making tools were perceived to potentially improve patient care and communication, although physicians expressed concern about lack of individualization, limitations of time, and the appropriateness of information. Conclusion: AA treatment decision-making is a complex process that often utilizes the expertise of a dermatologist, during which shared decision-making tools may be of value to both patients and physicians.

Factors influencing alopecia areata treatment decisions: A qualitative assessment.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease of hair loss in which patients may benefit from comprehensive understanding of AA's disease process and therapeutic options during treatment decision-making. Objective: Determine factors influencing patients' AA treatment decision-making. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted using semi-structured interview guides. Interviews were coded using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Twenty-one participants with AA were interviewed. Coding interrater reliability was κ = 0.87-0.91, indicating strong-almost perfect agreement. Participants faced multiple barriers, including lack of access to health care (n = 10, 47.6%) and lack of transparency about their condition and treatment options (n = 9, 42.9%). Information about AA was sought from primarily the internet (n = 15, 71.4%) and physician recommendation (n = 15, 71.4%). When choosing AA treatments, patients often considered treatment efficacy (n = 21, 100%), safety (n = 21, 100%), and convenience of use (n = 20, 95.2%). Limitations: Referral and regional biases may be present and limit generalizability. Conclusions: Patients with AA face various challenges including medical uncertainty and lack of information. Patients need trustworthy and accessible sources of information regarding their treatment that also take into consideration their preferences and values.

Complementary and alternative medicine for alopecia areata: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite high use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for alopecia areata (AA), efficacy and safety remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify all CAM therapies studied for treatment of AA. Outcomes of interest included disease course and psychologic well-being. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched to identify English articles containing original data investigating CAM in individuals with AA from 1950-2018. Quality was assessed with Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS: Of 1015 initial citations, 16 articles met inclusion criteria: 5 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective controlled cohorts, 4 prospective noncontrolled cohorts, 1 retrospective cohort, and 1 case series. CAM therapies with best evidence and efficacy for hair growth in AA include essential oil aromatherapy, topical garlic, and oral glucosides of peony with compound glycyrrhizin. Hypnosis and mindfulness psychotherapy represent low-quality evidence for improvement of psychologic and quality of life outcomes. Adverse events were rare and mild for all therapies evaluated. LIMITATIONS: Inconsistent or poorly reported study methodology and nonstandardized outcomes limit the conclusions that can be made from these studies. CONCLUSIONS: This work serves to inform physician treatment of patients with AA seeking CAM while encouraging further investigation into these therapies to address some of the therapeutic challenges of AA.

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Nutritional Supplements for Treating Hair Loss: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Despite the widespread use of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions for treating hair loss, the safety and effectiveness of available products remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate and compile the findings of all dietary and nutritional interventions for treatment of hair loss among individuals without a known baseline nutritional deficiency. Evidence Review: The MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception through October 20, 2021, to identify articles written in English with original findings from investigations of dietary and nutritional interventions in individuals with alopecia or hair loss without a known baseline nutritional deficiency. Quality was assessed with Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria. Outcomes of interest were disease course, both objectively and subjectively measured. Data were evaluated from January 3 to 11, 2022. Findings: The database searches yielded 6347 citations to which 11 articles from reference lists were added. Of this total, 30 articles were included: 17 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 11 clinical studies (non-RCT), and 2 case series studies. No diet-based interventional studies met inclusion criteria. Studies of nutritional interventions with the highest-quality evidence showed the potential benefit of Viviscal, Nourkrin, Nutrafol, Lamdapil, Pantogar, capsaicin and isoflavone, omegas 3 and 6 with antioxidants, apple nutraceutical, total glucosides of paeony and compound glycyrrhizin tablets, zinc, tocotrienol, and pumpkin seed oil. Kimchi and cheonggukjang, vitamin D3, and Forti5 had low-quality evidence for disease course improvement. Adverse effects were rare and mild for all the therapies evaluated. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this systematic review should be interpreted in the context of each study's design; however, this work suggests a potential role for nutritional supplements in the treatment of hair loss. Physicians should engage in shared decision-making by covering the potential risks and benefits of these treatments with patients experiencing hair loss. Future research should focus on larger RCTs with active comparators.

Shared Decision-Making, Therapeutic Choice, and Decisional Regret in Patients With Alopecia Areata.

Importance: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disorder of hair loss with a complex and evolving treatment landscape, making it an ideal setting for shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and physicians. Given the varying efficacy, experience, and risks of treatments for AA, we sought to evaluate patient preferences for SDM and the association of SDM with decisional regret. Objective: To evaluate patient preferences for SDM and the association of SDM with decisional regret. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional online survey using the validated SDMQ9 scale for shared decision-making and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation (NAAF) with the aim of assessing (1) patient preferences in SDM when making treatment decisions, (2) how patients perceived the last decision to have been made, (3) which components of SDM were incorporated into the last decision, and (4) decisional regret related to their last treatment decision. The survey was distributed from July 12, 2021, to August 2, 2021, and data analysis occurred from October 2021 to March 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included (1) patient preferences in incorporation of SDM, (2) how patients made their most recent treatment decision, (3) which components of SDM were incorporated into their most recent treatment decision measured with the validated SDMQ9, and (4) an assessment of decisional regret in relation to SDM components and the most recent treatment modality used by the patient as measured by the validated DRS. Results: Of 1387 individuals who initiated the survey, 1074 completed it and were included in the analysis (77.4% completion rate). Overall, 917 respondents were women (85.4%). There were 5 American Indian or Alaska Native respondents (0.5%), 33 were Asian (3.1%), 112 Black or African American (10.4%), 836 White (77.8%), and 36 were multiracial (3.4%) or other (36 [3.4%]). The mean age (SD) was 49.3 (15.4) years. Most respondents preferred making the final treatment decision themselves after considering their physician's opinion (503 [46.8%]). Of those who preferred to make treatment decisions using SDM, most made the last AA treatment decision with their physician (596 [55%]; 95% CI, 53%-58%; P < .001). The components of SDM implemented by the patients' dermatologists most identified were the physician "explained the advantages and disadvantages of treatment options" (472 [44%]), and the physician "asked me which treatment option I prefer" (494 [45.9%]). Incorporation of SDM by physicians was generally associated with decreased decisional regret (all ORs with 95% CIs greater than 1.1; P < .01). The treatments associated with the lowest decisional regret were Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, followed by biologics, and deciding not to treat; whereas, the highest decisional regret was reported with anthralin and minoxidil. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional survey study suggest that patients with AA prefer to make treatment decisions with their dermatologist using SDM. When SDM is used, patients report less decisional regret, indicating that SDM may help improve the patient-reported quality of treatment decisions. Newer, more efficacious therapies such as JAK inhibitors may be related to lower decisional regret. Future studies should seek to devise solutions to implement SDM as the AA treatment landscape continues to evolve.

Cannabis Use among Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Importance: Little is known about cannabis use among patients with alopecia areata (AA). These patients often experience significant psychosocial burden and may seek alternative therapies beyond that of traditional medical treatments, such as cannabis. Objective: To characterize cannabis use among patients with AA. Design: This was a cross-sectional study conducted from March 9, 2021, to March 22, 2021, using a web-based survey distributed to adult patients with AA using the National AA Foundation's email listserv and social media platforms. Results: 1,087 participants completed the survey (completion rate: 88.1%). Most participants were female (n = 870, 83.3%) and Caucasian (n = 771, 73.8%), with a mean age of 47.6 ± 15.5 years. 65.9% (n = 689) of participants with AA had a history of cannabis use and among those, 51.8% (n = 357) were current cannabis users. The most common reason for cannabis use among current users was for AA-related symptoms (n = 199, 55.7%), with the greatest perceived improvement in symptoms of stress (n = 261, 73.1%) and anxiety, sadness, and depression (n = 234, 65.6%). 80.4% (n = 287) indicated that cannabis had no impact on their hair loss. Conclusion: Cannabis use is common among patients with AA and is often used to alleviate the psychosocial symptoms related to AA, despite the lack of perceived improvement in hair regrowth.

Development of the alopecia areata scale for clinical use: Results of an academic-industry collaborative effort.

BACKGROUND: The current classification for alopecia areata (AA) does not provide a consistent assessment of disease severity. OBJECTIVE: To develop an AA severity scale based on expert experience. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was utilized. An advisory group of 22 AA clinical experts from the United States was formed to develop this AA scale. Representatives from the pharmaceutical industry provided feedback during its development. RESULTS: Survey responses were used to draft severity criteria, aspiring to develop a simple scale that may be easily applied in clinical practice. A consensus vote was held to determine the final AA severity statement, with all AA experts agreeing to adopt the proposed scale. LIMITATIONS: The scale is a static assessment intended to be used in clinical practice and not clinical trials. CONCLUSION: The final AA disease severity scale, anchored in the extent of hair loss, captures key features commonly used by AA experts in clinical practice. This scale will better aid clinicians in appropriately assessing severity in patients with this common disease.

Evaluation of Stigma Toward Individuals With Alopecia.

Importance: Perceived stigma among patients with alopecia is associated with impaired quality of life; however, the magnitude of laypersons' stigma toward individuals with alopecia is unknown. Objective: To determine the prevalence and magnitude of laypersons' stigma toward individuals with varying degrees of alopecia and whether stigma increases with increased severity of alopecia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study using an internet survey administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US participating on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. Portrait images of 6 individuals without hair loss were created using artificial intelligence and stock images. Each portrait was edited to create 2 additional versions, 1 with scalp hair loss and 1 with complete hair loss, for a total of 18 images. On January 9 to 10, 2020, the survey presented each internet respondent with 1 randomly selected portrait to be used in answering a series of stigma-related questions from 3 domains: stereotypes, social distance, and disease-related myths; the third domain was presented only to respondents who believed that the individual pictured had a medical condition. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the prevalence and magnitude of stigma of laypersons toward individuals with alopecia and the percentage of laypersons who believed the individual pictured had a medical condition as recorded in survey responses. Results: The survey was completed by 2015 respondents (99.9% completion rate) with a mean age of 37 (range, 18-78) years; 1014 (50.3%) were men; 1596 (79.2%) were White; and 1397 (69.3%) had a college or postcollege education. Endorsement of every stigma item increased as alopecia severity increased (2.4%-27.6%). Absolute change on the stereotype (0.5-0.6) and social distance scales (0.2-0.5) also increased, indicating more stigma. The percentage of respondents believing the individual pictured had a medical condition increased as alopecia severity increased (33.6%-75.7%; P < .001). Among the subgroup of respondents who were asked to rate their agreement with disease-related myths, the absolute change on the myth scale decreased as alopecia severity increased, indicating decreased stigma (-0.7 to -1.2). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional survey study found that stigmatizing attitudes of laypersons toward patients with alopecia exist across a multitude of social and professional scenarios. Stigma prevalence and magnitude vary by alopecia severity and possibly by whether alopecia is believed to be a medical condition.